HC food industry AQSIQ former discipline inspection chief Guo Rubin on "poison milk powder" incident in an interview said, "milk powder incident" is not a question of quality inspection departments. Milk in the existing governance processes, the firm is the first head of the Government bear the main responsibility for the negative regulatory supervisory responsibility, "milk representation, accountable, if only to manufacturers."

    Although Guo Rubin acknowledged that "poison milk powder" incident of food regulatory system, mechanism malpractice exposure, but he stressed the quality inspection departments milk powder incident was not a problem, simply a rejection of their own sector alone, "scapegoat." Play down their own responsibility, to problems and contradictions thrown other departments, that is, people often say that department, "pass the buck."

    Who are charged with supervision of dairy production and marketing quality responsibility, in the food regulatory system play a key role, quality inspection departments to actually be able to face worthy of outright, can be readily "pass the buck", because under their feet He is not tied to the accountability of"iron chain."

    From the "milk" is to reproduce early, from Formaldehyde, Sudan, irradiation of food to melamine, "poison bean," none of the major food safety startling, the current food safety system exposed serious flaws. The source of all existence of loopholes in food safety, the problem is loopholes in the system of accountability.

    From the production, distribution, sale and consumption to health checks, food consumption of the whole process, every step placed under the supervision of a particular institution. From the control system point of view, this should be a complete food safety network. If the strict system of accountability, without excuse, quality inspection, industry and commerce, food control, health care and other departments must perform their duties carefully. If the regulatory authorities to perform their duties and duty to defend, the food will not produce toxic, produced sales and distribution difficult, is time consumers will be dug up and ate. Unfortunately, due to the accountability system is not tight, negligence, agencies have the opportunity to "pass the buck", enables comprehensive monitoring network vulnerabilities exposed, toxic, harmful food took the opportunity to enter the market and endanger people.

    Strict accountability system in order to regulate the behavior of units and individuals by the standard behavior of long-term promotion and continued to develop a rigorous work-style and standard of business ethics. Only control the functions of living of each organization to administer every place, every company can manage. And manage the functions of the body, its assessment must be rigorous, thorough investigation of their negligence, breach of duty. When each agency, local, and enterprises have the fear, it did not dare to poison the consumer. Accountability loopholes are not blocked, food security vulnerability does not absolutely .

Author: River supernatural power chain Co., Ltd
website: www.shenlichain.com
main product: swing chain、iron chain